The Neanderthals of course are the most successful species of humans so far in that they were around on the planet for a lot longer than us and recent discoveries have begun to dispel the myths that Neanderthals were knuckle dragging morons. However despite being able to produce sophisticated tools and weapons the modern humans had a key advantage over them, projectile weapons.
Anthropologists have analysed the skeletons of early modern men and Neanderthals and found that the latter lack the backward displacement of the shoulder joint that results in overhead throwing activities. Without thrown overhead a projectile weapon has much greater speed and range. While the Neanderthals probably did still throw spears and other weapons modern humans who did throw overhead had a definite advantage. Steve Churchill, an associate professor of evolutionary anthropology at Duke University, said "perhaps their...short, squat body build with short and massive limbs was not conducive to using throwing-based hunting technology".
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
A look at the 1911 census
I have taken a look at the 1911 census which was put on-line yesterday. I did a search for my Grandmother who was just 5 at the time. The occupations of her siblings as listed on the census was interesting. I knew my Great-Grandfather was a miner but it was interesting that his two eldest sons living in the house were "rubber workers". I assume this means they worked in a tyre factory! I live, literally, a rolling tyre journey away from Fort Dunlop, who knows maybe they worked there.
My Grandmother's eldest sister Amy lists her occupation as "painter". I assume she didn't mean a house painter (or maybe it was, how common was that for a woman in 1911?) so maybe she was a painter in a factory. As with most of my family history research so far all i seem to find are more questions rather than that many answers!
My Grandmother's eldest sister Amy lists her occupation as "painter". I assume she didn't mean a house painter (or maybe it was, how common was that for a woman in 1911?) so maybe she was a painter in a factory. As with most of my family history research so far all i seem to find are more questions rather than that many answers!
Labels:
family history
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Unlocking secrets of Mediaeval manuscripts using DNA
North Carolina State University researcher Assistant Professor of English Timothy Stinson is working on techniques to use DNA analysis to date and locate the origins of the animal skin parchments used in many Mediaeval manuscripts. Up until now handwriting and linguistic analysis has been used but these methods have their limitations. Stinson is aiming to create a baseline of DNA markers from manuscripts with known dates and origins and then compare the DNA from manuscripts of unknown origin with the baseline. Genetic similarities could then assist in narrowing down the time scale and locale of the manuscript in question. It will also allow the tracing of the trade route of manuscripts through the mediaeval world.
1911 census goes online
The British 1911 census has been digitized and put on-line. The 1911 census was not originally intended to be made available until 2012 but a Freedom of Information Act request has seen it made available a few years early. When the 1901 census was made available it crashed the servers though at the moment the 1911 one seems fine, of course i am writing this at 8:20am!
Labels:
family history
Friday, January 9, 2009
Comet impacts may have caused ancient famine
Continuing the ancient climate change theme, scientists think multiple comet impacts 1500 years ago plunged the world into darkness and caused worldwide famines.
Historical records tell of a "global dimming" in 536CE where a fog of dust blanketed the Earth cutting daylight, dropping temperatures and causing crops to fail. Until now the cause of this dimming was unknown though some speculated it could have been due to volcanic activity. A team from Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory now think it was due to multiple comet impacts. Tiny balls of condensed rock vapour found in ice cores taken at Greenland date back to 536, this is the kind of debris thrown up by a major impact. The length of time the debris was laid down indicates there was more than one impact. Two possible craters have also been identified by the team led by Dallas Abbott.
Historical records tell of a "global dimming" in 536CE where a fog of dust blanketed the Earth cutting daylight, dropping temperatures and causing crops to fail. Until now the cause of this dimming was unknown though some speculated it could have been due to volcanic activity. A team from Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory now think it was due to multiple comet impacts. Tiny balls of condensed rock vapour found in ice cores taken at Greenland date back to 536, this is the kind of debris thrown up by a major impact. The length of time the debris was laid down indicates there was more than one impact. Two possible craters have also been identified by the team led by Dallas Abbott.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Decline of Roman and Byzantine Empires 1, 400 years ago may have been driven by climate change
A team of American and Israeli geologists have put together a much more detailed than previously possible climate record from 200 BCE to 1100 CE from geochemical analysis of a stalagmite from Soreq Cave near Jerusalem. Using an advanced ion microprobe they measured oxygen isotope signatures and impurities in the mineral layers of a stalagmite to sufficient resolution to be able to tell the rainfall for individual years and seasons. They were thus able to build up a detailed picture of the climate.
And they found the weather between 100 and 700CE became increasingly dry with "steep drops in precipitation" between 100 and 400 CE, a period that coincides with a drop in power and influence of the Roman and Byzantine Empires in the region. University of Wisconsin-Madison Professor John Valley said "Whether this is what weakened the Byzantines or not isn't known, but it is an interesting correlation."
And they found the weather between 100 and 700CE became increasingly dry with "steep drops in precipitation" between 100 and 400 CE, a period that coincides with a drop in power and influence of the Roman and Byzantine Empires in the region. University of Wisconsin-Madison Professor John Valley said "Whether this is what weakened the Byzantines or not isn't known, but it is an interesting correlation."
Time to start studying again
I need to get back into the studying groove again, i did plan to start my next Open University course (AA312 Total war and social change: Europe 1914-1955) last Sunday but did not feel quite ready! Actually i have until early February until the course officially starts but i like to start early so i have a little slack in case i need to take the odd week off especially when the sun is finally shining in the Summer!
I have been doing quite a lot of background reading though, "The Origins of the Second World War in Europe" by PMH Bell is an excellent book i recommend. I've just finished the short but very interesting "The inter-war crisis 1919-1939" by RJ Overy too.
I have been doing quite a lot of background reading though, "The Origins of the Second World War in Europe" by PMH Bell is an excellent book i recommend. I've just finished the short but very interesting "The inter-war crisis 1919-1939" by RJ Overy too.
Labels:
AA312,
Open University
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)